CURRICULUM COMPACTING: DIFFERENTIATING ALGEBRA SYLLABUS ACCORDING TO THE READINESS LEVELS OF GIFTED STUDENTS

Authors

  • Nurul Suzaina Joli Pusat PERMATApintar® Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Hasrul Kamarulzaman Pusat PERMATApintar® Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Noriah Mohd Ishak Pusat PERMATApintar® Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Fairuz Adlidna Badro Hissam Pusat PERMATApintar® Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azrina Md Azhari Pusat PERMATApintar® Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nursakinah Mat Hazir Pusat PERMATApintar® Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.16831693

Keywords:

Curriculum Compacting, Gifted Learners, Algebra Syllabus, Differentiated Instruction, Learning Preferences, Readiness

Abstract

Gifted learners are unique, in the way they learn i.e. in processing new information and knowledge. Because of their uniqueness, teachers need to identify their learning preferences prior to lesson planning, and differentiate their instruction accordingly with appropriate classroom strategies. This study investigated a differentiation strategy called curriculum compacting, which was applied in the teaching of Algebra among gifted students. Curriculum compacting allows learners who have the potential to pursue higher level or more advanced topics at faster rate. Of the national standard, Algebra I, II, and III are introduced to Form 1, Form 2, and Form 3 respectively. However, at Kolej PERMATApintar, Algebra I, II, and III were compacted, in accordance with the gifted students’ learning preferences i.e. readiness levels, and taught to Form 1 gifted students. A total of 166 Form 1 gifted students participated in this experimental study. Test results were gathered and analyzed representing the effect of curriculum compacting on the gifted students’ achievement. The findings revealed that 38.6% students had excellent understanding of the compacted Algebra syllabus (marks between 85-100), 44% achieved good understanding (marks between 65-84), 11.4% had moderate understanding (marks between 50-64), and only 6% had poor understanding (marks between 0-49). From this study, we can conclude that curriculum compacting is a beneficial differentiation technique for gifted students in the teaching and learning of Algebra.

References

Baska, L.K. (1989). Characteristics and needs of the gifted. In J. Feldhusen, J. Van Tassel-Baska, & K. Seeley (Eds), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp.15-28). Denver:Love Publishing Company.

Chessman, A. (2007). Catering for difference: institutionalising a program for gifted students in a NSW comprehensive high school.

Christine, E., Judy, F., Jill, K., Wendy, K., Barbara, M., Terry, P., Vivian, R., Trevor, T.,Elizabeth, T., Sharon, W., & Ted, N., (2013). Teaching Students Who Are Gifted and Talented: A Handbook for Teachers. Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Education.

Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted (4th ed.) Columbus: Merrill. Commonwealth of Australia. The report of the Senate select Committee on the education of gifted and talented children. Canberra: Australian Government publishing service.

Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Jane, P., Moustapha, D., & Alberta, L. (2017). Differentiated Instruction in the High School Science Classroom: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(7), 30-54.

Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, F., Hébert, T. P., Plucker, J. A., & Smidst, J. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph 93106). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development (3rd edition). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Manning, S. (2006). Recognizing Gifted Students: A Practical Guide for Teachers by Sandra Manning. KAPPA DELTA PI RECORD • WINTER. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2006.10516435

Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd Edition). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson, C., & Imbeau, M. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-04

How to Cite

Joli, N. S., Kamarulzaman, M. H., Ishak, N. M., Hissam, F. A., Azhari, A. M., & Hazir, N. M. (2022). CURRICULUM COMPACTING: DIFFERENTIATING ALGEBRA SYLLABUS ACCORDING TO THE READINESS LEVELS OF GIFTED STUDENTS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 1683–1693. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.16831693