CHATGPT AS A SOCRATIC ASSISTANT: DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ REFLECTIVE AND CRITICAL THINKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.178195Keywords:
Socratic Method, ChatGPT, Posthumanist Methodology, Critical Thinking, AI-Generated PromptsAbstract
The introduction of ChatGPT and its use in the education sector has received varying responses. Termed as ‘apocalyptic’, ChatGPT presents an ethical dilemma with the possibility of leading students towards plagiarism, lack of criticality and passivity. However, if used properly, this tool, similar to other technological pedagogical tools that have initially been feared or criticised, may contribute to the development of STEM skills such as critical analysis, communication, independent thinking and reflection. Within this perspective and building on the principles of the Socratic Method with an emphasis on critical thinking, intellectual engagement and reflection, this paper explores the use of ChatGPT as a Socratic assistant. ChatGPT is, therefore, presented as a collaborative tool that enriches the learning environment whereby students can develop their critical skills, question assumptions, develop intellectual curiosity through prompting and eventually produce reflective and critical responses. This research adopts a posthumanist innovative methodology where data is produced through the intra-action between the researcher (human) and ChatGPT (non-human). The chosen methodology reflects the entanglement of the human (students, teachers) and non-human (AI) in an educational space dominated by chatbots and other technological assistance. Through generated examples, this paper shows how ChatGPT can be integrated into teaching and learning contexts, fostering deeper inquiry and self-reflection aligning with the Socratic Method. This research contributes to discourses on AI and its ethical use in transforming teaching and learning through innovative methods and may assist teachers in the development of innovative teaching practices assisted by AI.
References
Ahmad, H. & Gasmi, S. (2024). Future Learning Strategies: Utilizing AI Tools and ChatGPT for Critical Thinking Development. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.10904.00002
Alafnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60–68.
Al-Zahrani, A. M. & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
Au Yeung, J., Kraljevic, Z., Luintel, A., Balston, A., Idowu, E., Dobson, R. J., & Teo, J. T. (2023). AI chatbots not yet ready for clinical use. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1161098.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum Physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Chukhlomin, V. (2024). Socratic Prompts: Engineered Dialogue as a Tool for AI-Enhanced Educational Inquiry. Latin American Business and Sustainability Review. doi:10.70469/albx01012024
Clark, T. M. (2023). Investigating the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot with general chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1905–1916.
Cong-Lem, N., Soyoof, A.& Tsering, D. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Limitations and Associated Opportunities of ChatGPT. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2344142
Crompton, H. & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Digital Educational Council. (2024). AI or Not AI: What Students Want. Digital Educational Council Global AI Student Survey 2024. Retrieved from
https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/digital-education-council-global-ai-student-survey-2024
Duong, D., & Solomon, B. D. (2023). Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions. European Journal of Human Genetics, 32(4), 466–468.
Fikri, H. (2024). The Role of Teachers in Using ChatGPT as a Feedback Provider. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385199637
Garcia, A. (2023, April 10). Technology might be making education worse. Stanford Report. Retrieved from
https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2023/04/technology-might-be-making-education-worse
Glahn, K. (2023). Using ChatGPT to teach English for academic purposes: Perspectives from the classroom. Journal of Education, Innovation and Communication, 5(2), 63–75.
Green, P. (2022, December 11). No, ChatGPT is not the end of high school English. But here’s the useful tool it offers teachers. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2022/12/11/no-chatgpt-is-not-the-end-of-high-school-english-but-heres-the-useful-tool-it-offers-teachers
Haleem, A., Javaid, M. & Singh, R. P. (2022) An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations. doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., & Fischer, F. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274.
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL EJ, 27(3), n3.
Liang, W. & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101645
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1-35.
Livingstone, V. (2024, September 30). I Quit Teaching Because of ChatGPT. Time. Retrieved from
https://time.com/7026050/chatgpt-quit-teaching-ai-essay/
Mann, J. (2024, August 14). This high school is replacing teachers with ChatGPT and AI tools to personalize learning for some students. Business Insider Africa. Retrieved from
Nayar, P. (2014). Posthumanism. Language Arts & Disciplines, Polity Press.
Nazari, M. & Saadi, G. (2024). Developing effective prompts to improve communication with ChatGPT: a formula for higher education stakeholders. Discover Education. doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00122-w
Overholser, J. C. (1993). Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 30(1), 67-74.
Parsons, B., & Curry, J. H. (2024). Can ChatGPT pass graduate-level instructional design assignments? Potential implications of artificial intelligence in education and a call to action. TechTrends, 68(1), 67– 78.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking: The art of Socratic questioning. Journal of developmental education, 31(1), 36-37.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Internet Seen as Positive Influence on Education but Negative on Morality in Emerging and Developing Nations. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/03/Pew-Research-Center-Technology-Report-FINAL-March-19-20151.pdf
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783.
Stojanov, A. (2023). Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledge- able other: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 35.
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355–366.
UNESCO. (2024). Critical Thinking and Generative Artificial Intelligence. International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/articles/critical-thinking-and-generative-artificial-intelligence
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S. & Li, L. D. (2024) The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments. doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Published Articles
Author(s) retain the article copyright and publishing rights without any restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.