TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AS ECOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE: AN ECOPEDAGOGY STUDY

Authors

  • Ali Syahban Amir Student of Doctoral Program at English Education Departement, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia/ Lecturer At Institut Turatea Indonesia, Jeneponto, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Basri English Education Departement, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sahril English Education Departement, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Supriadi Student of Doctoral Program at Lingustics, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia/ Lecturer at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Amkop, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Eri Kurniawan Lingustics Program Study, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Kamaruddin Economic Development, Institut Turatea Indonesia, Jeneponto, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.424438

Keywords:

Traditional Knowledge, Ecological Intelligence, Ecopedagogy, Digital Literacy, Local Content Education, Conservation Pedagogy

Abstract

Humans living in ancestral environments tend to preserve inherited habits, including rituals and daily practices rooted in local wisdom. This traditional knowledge, reflecting ecological intelligence, is at risk of fading due to the lack of educational exposure. Using qualitative  methods—observation, interviews, documentation, and audio-visual records—this study explores how schools can become a platform for revitalizing ecological intelligence through traditional knowledge. More importantly, this study introduces the integration of digital literacy as a vital tool in documenting, disseminating, and preserving traditional ecological knowledge. Digital storytelling, community-based multimedia archives, and ecopedagogical content delivered via online platforms enable students not only to appreciate but also to participate in the conservation of their cultural and ecological heritage. The findings suggest that both ecological intelligence and digital literacy can be developed in synergy through project-based learning rooted in local content. This combination equips students with the cognitive and technological skills necessary to engage with global environmental issues while remaining grounded in local wisdom.

References

Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2015). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices.

Routledge.

Coiro, J., Kiili, C., & Castek, J. (2019). Designing pedagogies for digital literacy: Exploring the intersection of formal and informal learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(2), 137–142.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.

Gadotti, M. (2008). Education for sustainability: A critical contribution to the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Green Books.

Gardner, H. (2013). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Goleman, D. (2010). Ecological intelligence: How knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything. Broadway Books.

Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press.

Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis: The ecopedagogy movement. Peter Lang.

Kurniawan, D. (2022). Tantangan implementasi ecopedagogy dalam kurikulum nasional. Jurnal Pendidikan Lingkungan, 15(2), 78–92.

Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2014). The new literacies of online research and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 378–391.

Mayuasti, S. P., & Prahara, S. (2022). The protection and preservation of Minangkabau traditional knowledge in muatan lokal curriculum of West Sumatera. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 4(3), 295–298.

Misiaszek, G. W. (2018). Ecopedagogy: Critical environmental teaching for planetary justice and global sustainable development. Routledge.

Pulhehe, N. (2024). Indigenous knowledge in Indonesia curriculum development: Literature review of Indonesia's education policy. Inovasi Kurikulum, 21(1), 97–108.

Rowsell, J., Morrell, E., & Alvermann, D. E. (2017). Critical literacies and young learners: Connecting classroom practice to the world. Routledge.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2015). Kebudayaan dan pendidikan: Tantangan-tantangan dalam pendidikan multikultural. Kompas.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives.

UNESCO Publishing.

Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice?

Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211–239.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-05

How to Cite

Ali Syahban Amir, Muhammad Basri, Sahril, Supriadi, Eri Kurniawan, & Kamaruddin. (2025). TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AS ECOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE: AN ECOPEDAGOGY STUDY. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.424438